Challenges and Opportunities of Art Freedom Policy

Mahasiswa Hubungan Internasional, Universitas Sebelas Maret
·waktu baca 4 menit
Tulisan dari Yohana Safira tidak mewakili pandangan dari redaksi kumparan

Freedom of expression through art is a part of human rights guaranteed by both national and international law. Art is recognized as an important medium for individuals and communities to voice ideas, thoughts, and social criticism (Nazar, H. S. E. S., & Putri, N. R, 2022). This freedom includes the right of artists to express themselves through various artistic media by made visual, literary, performative, or musical also ensuring public access to their work. In the context of Indonesian history, freedom of expression has experienced fluctuations. From the New Order era, state control over cultural expression was highly strict. Many artworks, songs, and films were censored or banned for being considered subversive or incompatible with state ideology (Setiyono & Tarigan, 2020). Although the 1998 Reformation opened up greater space for public and artistic expression, restrictions still particularly against works that address issues of religion, sexuality, or criticism of power (Gusti Grehenson, 2025).
In the world of art, freedom of expression is more than just a civil right. It serves as a driving force behind creativity, innovation, social reflection, and the preservation of critical cultural discourse. When artists are free to express themselves, the public gains access to diverse perspectives that might otherwise be overlooked or silenced in mainstream conversations (Pinterhukum, 2025). Yet in Indonesia, this freedom is often met with obstacles. Artists continue to face cancellations of exhibitions, bans on performances, or even criminal charges under accusations of blasphemy or moral offenses. These challenges persist despite the legal protections enshrined in instruments like Article 28E, paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution. In practice, the enforcement of these rights is still heavily influenced by conservative societal, political, and legal pressures. Protecting artistic freedom, therefore, is essential to nurturing a democratic society that values inclusivity, critical thinking, and cultural richness.
For Indonesian artists seeking to engage with the global art scene, the road is even steeper. Structural and cultural barriers often limit their access to international opportunities. Major hurdles include visa restrictions, high travel costs, and limited state support in the form of art grants or cultural diplomacy programs. According to Koalisi Seni, many artists struggle to attend overseas exhibitions or residencies due to administrative red tape and a lack of facilitation from the government (Koalisi Seni, 2024). Despite the strength and uniqueness of contemporary Indonesian art, it is still frequently viewed through an “exotic” lens, sidelined by curatorial bias and underrepresented in international art discourse (Ary Hermawan, 2008). The problem is compounded by the uneven development of artistic infrastructure across Indonesia. Outside key cultural hubs like Jakarta, Yogyakarta, and Bali, many artists lack access to proper training, production facilities, and professional networks limiting their ability to thrive globally. Moreover, some artists feel pressured to align their work with dominant cultural or ideological norms, particularly when presenting their work on international platforms. All of this highlights the urgent need for stronger and more sustainable cross-sector support to elevate Indonesian art on the world stage.
Recognizing these challenges, both the government and civil society have begun to implement policies aimed at building a more supportive art ecosystem. Since 2020, the Directorate General of Culture has introduced the Cultural Sector Facilitation scheme to help fund artistic production through the national budget. In 2022, this effort was expanded with the launch of Dana Indonesiana, a cultural endowment fund created under the Law on Cultural Advancement. Meanwhile, organizations like Koalisi Seni have received funding from UNESCO’s International Fund for Cultural Diversity to establish systems for monitoring artistic freedom. They have also consistently advocated for clearer regulations, the empowerment of local arts councils, and the long-term sustainability of art funding through endowments.
In short, while freedom of artistic expression is protected by law, its realization remains uneven in Indonesia. Censorship, social stigma, and inadequate structural support continue to pose significant barriers. However, initiatives like Dana Indonesiana and Koalisi Seni’s ongoing work offer hope for a future where Indonesian art can flourish more freely supported by a vibrant, inclusive, and collaborative ecosystem that honors the full spectrum of creative voices.
Bibliography
Gusti.Grehenson. (2025). Sensor Seni, Antara Pembatasan dan Mempertajam Ide Kebebasan Berekspresi. Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://ugm.ac.id/id/berita/sensor-seni-antara-pembatasan-dan-mempertajam-ide-kebebasan-berekspresi/
Hermawan, A. (2008). Indonesian contemporary art still unnoticed in global art discourses. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2008/06/14/indonesian-contemporary-art-still-unnoticed-global-art-discourses.html
Koalisi Seni. (2024). To go or not to go: the challenges of Indonesian artists on the global stage. Koalisi Seni. https://koalisiseni.or.id/en/artikel/to-go-or-not-to-go-the-challenges-of-indonesian-artists-on-the-global-stage
Nazar, H. S. E. S., & Putri, N. R. (2022). Mural: Jaminan dan Batasan Kebebasan Berekspresi di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Hukum. Jurnal Restorasi Hukum, 5(2).
Pinterhukum. (2025). Represi Hukum terhadap Kebebasan Seni: Antara Proteksi Ekspresi dan Kontrol Kekuasaan. pinterhukum.com - Layanan Jasa Hukum Terlengkap dan Terpercaya di Indonesia. https://pinterhukum.com/represi-hukum-terhadap-kebebasan-seni-antara-proteksi-ekspresi-dan-kontrol-kekuasaan/
Setiyono, B., & Tarigan, D. (2020). Kebebasan berekspresi di era transisi demokrasi Indonesia. Jurnal HAM, 11(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2020.11.145-158
